"These conversations about contraception are happening now, in the present day, with outdated views and inaccurate information playing a leading role."Note first that believing that human life should not be extinguished arbitrarily is an "outdated view".
Second, let me analyze this claim of "inaccurate information". It comes here:
"The employers think that certain forms of contraception (emergency contraception pills and intrauterine devices) cause abortions. But what they believe about science is contradicted by the science itself.Ah, now we come to the crux of the matter!
Emergency contraception pills work by inhibiting or postponing ovulation, or the release of the egg, and this prevents fertilization from occurring. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) work by preventing sperm from reaching the egg, either by creating a barrier or by creating an environment that inhibits the mobility and viability of sperm or, in the case of copper IUDs, potentially by preventing implantation of a fertilized egg before a woman is pregnant." (emphasis added)
The medical establishment has declared that pregnancy does not begin until implantation, and that abortion is the end of pregnancy. Therefore, preventing implantation prevents pregnancy, and no pregnancy means no abortion.
So, science tells us these treatments do lead to the death of human beings - just not "abortion" as defined by the medical establishment. Those who define abortion as "intentionally killing an unborn human being" are supported by science.