Ars Technica has coverage of a topic I covered earlier in "People will believe anything - except the Bible".
One hundred years ago, the idea that "nothing exploded to become everything" would have been laughed at. Now, it is rapidly becoming the standard atheist cosmology.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Saturday, June 20, 2009
ASC and Leukemia
Interesting article at Science Daily.
Here, they are comparing the use of stem cells from the patient (nonallogeneic, or autologous) or from a donor (allogeneic). ESC are effectively always allogeneic.
The findings indicate that allogeneic treatments only benefit medium and high risk patients.
Here, they are comparing the use of stem cells from the patient (nonallogeneic, or autologous) or from a donor (allogeneic). ESC are effectively always allogeneic.
The findings indicate that allogeneic treatments only benefit medium and high risk patients.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Homosexual Animals
An article I wanted to touch on briefly at Science Daily.
The first point is the interesting tendency towards the argument, "Animals do it, so it's ok!"
The second is an evolutionist / creationist point.
The creationist would say, "Homosexual behavior in animals is a product of the Fall (even leading to genetic changes). It is representative of our rebellion, and refusal to honor the image of God. The animals are simply reflecting that behavior in us."
The atheist would say "Homosexual behavior has evolved over millions of years."
But what about Christian evolutionists? If homosexual behavior is genetic, and is encoded in base pairs from millions of years ago, is it reflective of Creation before the Fall?
Is it part of God's "good" order?
The first point is the interesting tendency towards the argument, "Animals do it, so it's ok!"
The second is an evolutionist / creationist point.
The creationist would say, "Homosexual behavior in animals is a product of the Fall (even leading to genetic changes). It is representative of our rebellion, and refusal to honor the image of God. The animals are simply reflecting that behavior in us."
The atheist would say "Homosexual behavior has evolved over millions of years."
But what about Christian evolutionists? If homosexual behavior is genetic, and is encoded in base pairs from millions of years ago, is it reflective of Creation before the Fall?
Is it part of God's "good" order?
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Cosmological Measurements
A very revealing article at Science Daily.
Interesting details:
Interesting details:
- A star shrinking by 15% in 15 years, no one knows why
- Changes in methodology in just the past year have moved the star from 430 ly away to 640 ly (an error of 48.9%).
Friday, June 12, 2009
Cosmological Time
Time and distance are used almost interchangeably in cosmology. Measurements pertaining to either can be critical in evaluating truth claims.
The referenced article at Science News is a good case for why we should be skeptical of "computer models" (I know, I used to write models of computer hardware).
The referenced article at Science News is a good case for why we should be skeptical of "computer models" (I know, I used to write models of computer hardware).
"By including in their model previously ignored features such as the maximum possible rate of rotation and subtle shifts in the observed radio frequency due to a pulsar’s motion across the sky, the team finds that some millisecond pulsars are up to 10 times younger or 10 times older than earlier estimates suggest."
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Obama, Islam, and Tolerance
I can't help but laugh at modern (or post-modern) man.
Christians are intolerant because they:
Excellent summary at Insight Scoop.
Christians are intolerant because they:
- Proclaim what they believe to be true (the Gospel), and ask other people to consider the repercussions of it (repent and be saved)
- Proclaim that Jesus is the only way to be saved
Excellent summary at Insight Scoop.
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Stellar Distance 2
I previously mentioned a method for measuring distance in space using novae.
There is another method, called cepheid. The Wikipedia article is a good place to start.
It is important to note that this methodology is dependent on the assumption that these stars are behaving the way that we believe they are, and that our estimates of measuring the distance to some of them is correct.
There is another method, called cepheid. The Wikipedia article is a good place to start.
It is important to note that this methodology is dependent on the assumption that these stars are behaving the way that we believe they are, and that our estimates of measuring the distance to some of them is correct.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)